“... and that St. John gave DeAngelis the decision of the judge. Not true at all.
Paul is no genius but even HE must know there is such a thing as the Judicial Website. If one has even half a brain one can access almost any public legal information.”
Which half of the brain do you need to use to find what Mr. DeAngelis says he found? He actually does not state that he obtained the Perrotti VS St. John Decision from the CT Judicial Website. You know why? Because it is not there! If it was there Mr. DeAngelis would have provided the link to bolster his argument.
But just for fun, I engaged half my brain and visited the CT Judicial Website;
http://www.jud.ct.gov/index.html
I could not find it, even using both halves of my brain. You can search the entire site and nothing about the case comes up.
But, there is more. Court decisions are typed up on computers, they are then made into PDF files and published on the Judicial Website. They are in essence, originals.
Mr. DeAngelis published a PDF that was a xeroxed copy. Why would the state of Connecticut take a decision that was prepared using a computer, print it out on paper, then scan each page back into a computer, use desktop software to arrange each page and create a PDF? Even for the State, with all it’s inefficiency would not do that. They would do what everyone else does who creates PDFs. They could create their document, and with one click of the mouse it is made into a PDF file.
All the decisions posted on the CT Judicial Website I found are clean PDFs. They are not xeroxed copies, scanned and then made into PDFs.
What also is curious is that Mr. DeAngelis’s copy is indeed marked as “COPY.” No other decision on the website is marked in such a manner. Who would get copies marked as “COPY”; plaintiffs and defendants.
How was it that Mr. DeAngelis was able to find this decision on the CT website and publish it on his website even before Neil Perrotti was aware of the decision?
It seems obvious that Mr. DeAngelis and Mr. St. John now enjoy a close working relationship.
Posts
6 comments:
"It seems obvious that Mr. DeAngelis and Mr. St. John now enjoy a close working relationship"
and that relationship will turn Middlebury into Terryville. You think property values are bad here now? Just wait.
Maybe they share a bed together with Heidcamp as well now.
The number in the top right corner of the page "21412-1" appears to be a transaction number for a judicial branch cash register. If you go to the courthouse and ask to see the file there maybe a copy request form in the file that would tell you who requested the copies. Or you could FOI the receipt tape and see who the payor was.
Also anyone who got a copy would get a copy marked "copy" because . . . wait for it . . . it's not the original in the court file! Wow, that was tough to figure out! My head hurts.
So, Perrotti brings this suit forward 17 years after the incident (?) and there are no witnesses except other Perrotti's ? Hello ......anybody home
Your right, I forgot. Sexual predators like to have an audience when they are molesting drunken teen-agers...
Post a Comment